Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (2024)

Physical Review A

covering atomic, molecular, and optical physics and quantum information
  • Highlights
  • Letters
  • Recent
  • Accepted
  • Collections
  • Authors
  • Referees
  • Search
  • Press
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Perspective
  • Open Access

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies

Mario Krenn, Jonas Landgraf, Thomas Foesel, and Florian Marquardt
Phys. Rev. A 107, 010101 – Published 3 January 2023
  • Article
  • References
  • Citing Articles (29)

PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

In recent years the dramatic progress in machine learning has begun to impact many areas of science and technology significantly. In the present perspective article, we explore how quantum technologies are benefiting from this revolution. We showcase in illustrative examples how scientists in the past few years have started to use machine learning and more broadly methods of artificial intelligence to analyze quantum measurements, estimate the parameters of quantum devices, discover new quantum experimental setups, protocols, and feedback strategies, and generally improve aspects of quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum simulation. We highlight open challenges and future possibilities and conclude with some speculative visions for the next decade.

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (1)
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (2)
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (3)
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (4)
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (5)
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (6)
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (7)

1 More

  • Received 7 August 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.010101

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (8)

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Open access publication funded by the Max Planck Society.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Research Areas

Machine learningQuantum circuitsQuantum communicationQuantum computationQuantum controlQuantum engineeringQuantum entanglementQuantum metrologyQuantum protocols

Quantum Information, Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Mario Krenn1,*, Jonas Landgraf1,2, Thomas Foesel1,2, and Florian Marquardt1,2

  • 1Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen 91058, Germany
  • 2Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • *ML4qtech@mpl.mpg.de

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand

Issue

Vol. 107, Iss. 1 — January 2023

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (9)
Reuse & Permissions
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (12)

Authorization Required

Other Options
  • Buy Article »
  • Find an Institution with the Article »

×

Download & Share

PDFExportReuse & PermissionsCiting Articles (29)

×

Images

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (13)

    Figure 1

    Overview of tasks in the area of quantum technologies that machine learning and artificial intelligence can help solve better, as explained in this perspective article.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (14)

    Figure 2

    Basics of neural networks and machine learning techniques. (a)Operation of a single artificial neuron. (b)Structure of a neural network with dense layers. (c)Evolution of the network's parameters θ (which contains weights and biases of the neural network) in the cost function landscape using stochastic gradient descent. For every step (orange arrows) the gradients of the averaged cost function with respect to θ (gray dashed line) are approximated by the gradient averaged over a random batch. The parameters θ̂ minimize the averaged cost function. (d)Classification of unlabeled data. (e) Reinforcement learning problem modeled as Markov decision process.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (15)

    Figure 3

    State estimation via neural networks. (a)Measurements on many identical copies of a quantum state can be processed to produce an estimate of the quantum state. (b)A continuous weak measurement on a single quantum system can be used to update the estimated state. In both (a)and (b), a single network is trained to estimate arbitrary states correctly. (c)One can also train a network-based generative model to reproduce the statistics of a quantum state, i.e., to sample from the probability distribution. Training requires many identical copies that can be measured, so the statistics can be learned. Here one network represents only a single quantum state. It can be extended to handle measurements in arbitrary bases.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (16)

    Figure 4

    Machine learning for parameter estimation in quantum devices. (a)A typical scenario, with the measurement result statistics depending on both some tuneable measurement setting and the unknown parameter(s), here represented as phase shifts in a Mach-Zehnder setup. (b)An adaptive measurement strategy can be illustrated as a tree, with branches on each level corresponding to different measurement outcomes. Depending on those outcomes, a certain next measurement setting (indicated as “αj”) needs to be selected. Finding the best strategy is a challenging task, as it corresponds to searching the space of all such trees. (c)Neural generative models can be used to randomly sample possible future measurement outcomes (here 2D current-voltage maps as in[68]) that are compatible with previous measurement outcomes. This is helpful for selecting the optimal next measurement location. Different random locations in latent space result in different samples. (d)Measurement outcome vs measurement setting for five possible underlying parameter values (different curves; measurement uncertainty indicated via thickness). We aim to maximize the information gain, i.e., choose the setting which best pinpoints the parameter (which is not equivalent to maximizing the uncertainty of the outcome).

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (17)

    Figure 5

    (a)The eventual goal of model-free reinforcement learning is the direct application to experiments, which then can be treated as a black box. Many actual implementations, however, use model-free RL techniques applied to model-based simulations. (b)Model-based reinforcement learning directly exploits the availability of a model, e.g., taking gradients through differentiable dynamics.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (18)

    Figure 6

    Discovery of quantum experiments. Quantum optics experiments can be represented by colored graphs. Using the most general, complete graph as a starting representation, the AI's goal is to extract the conceptual core of the solution, which can then be understood by human scientists. The solution can then be translated to numerous different experimental configurations[113].

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (19)

    Figure 7

    Discovery of quantum circuits and feedback strategies with discrete gates. (a)A reinforcement-learning agent acts on a multiqubit system by selecting gates, potentially conditioned on measurement outcomes, finding an optimized quantum circuit or quantum feedback strategy. (b)A fixed layout quantum circuit with adjustable parameters that can be optimized via gradient ascent to achieve some goal like state preparation or variational ground state search (possibly including feedback).

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (20)

    Figure 8

    Quantum error correction. Syndrome interpretation in a surface code as a task that a neural network can be trained to perform.

    Reuse & Permissions

×

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Aracelis Kilback

Last Updated:

Views: 6473

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (64 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aracelis Kilback

Birthday: 1994-11-22

Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

Phone: +5992291857476

Job: Legal Officer

Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.