Temporal characteristics of iconic memory (2024)

  • Letter
  • Published:
  • VINCENT DI LOLLO1

Nature volume267,pages 241–243 (1977)Cite this article

  • 1251 Accesses

  • 143 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

THE duration of visual persistence (iconic memory) is inversely related, up to a point, to the duration of the inducing stimulus. This suggests that iconic memory can more properly be identified with ongoing neural processes than with the decaying contents of a sensory store. Since the publication of Sperling's influential monograph1 there has been general agreement that a relatively faithful representation of a visual display remains perceptually available for several hundred milliseconds after the distal stimulus has vanished. This led to the postulation of a short-term visual store, also called iconic memory2 or sensory register3, with contents decaying rapidly after the termination of the inducing display. The terms visual persistence or icon are commonly used to refer to the perceptual availability of the decaying contents of the sensory store. Iconic memory is regarded as having temporal combinatorial properties which allow perceptual integration of two or more sequential displays even if separated by a brief temporal gap. Integration in iconic memory was convincingly demonstrated in a study where the subjects were required to identify which element in a briefly-displayed array of 16 alphabet characters had been singled out by a temporally trailing bar marker4. Temporal integration has also provided an explanation for some aspects of visual masking5 and for temporal integration of patterns whose parts were presented sequentially in time6,7. Here I question the view that iconic memory is a store whose contents begin to decay when the inducing stimulus is terminated. I suggest that the duration of iconic persistence is linked to the duration of visual processes which begin at the onset of stimulation and continue for a given duration, whether or not the inducing stimulus is still on display. This view is based on the finding that the duration of visual persistence is negatively related to the duration of the inducing stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Change institution

Buy or subscribe

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

£199.00 per year

only £3.90 per issue

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Temporal characteristics of iconic memory (1)

Noisy and hierarchical visual memory across timescales

Article 08 February 2024

Temporal characteristics of iconic memory (2)

Strongly masked content retained in memory made accessible through repetition

Article Open access 13 May 2021

Temporal characteristics of iconic memory (3)

Continuity fields enhance visual perception through positive serial dependence

Article 08 April 2024

References

  1. Sperling, G. Psychol. Monogr. 74, 1 (1960).

    Article Google Scholar

  2. Neisser, U. Cognitive Psychology (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar

  3. Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. H. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory 2, 89 (eds Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T.) (Academic, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar

  4. Averbach, E. & Sperling, G. in Symposium on Information Theory (ed. Cherry, C.) 196–211 (Butterworth, London, 1961).

    Google Scholar

  5. Uttal, W. R. Perception Psychophys. 6, 121–128 (1969).

    Article Google Scholar

  6. Eriksen, C. W. & Collins, J. F. J. exp. PhyscoL 77, 376–382 (1968).

    CAS Google Scholar

  7. Hogben, J. H. & Di Lollo, V. Vision Res. 14, 1059–1069 (1974).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  8. Granit, R. Sensory Mechanisms of the Retina (Oxford University Press, New York, 1947).

    Google Scholar

  9. Sakitt, B. Psych. Rev. 83, 257–276 (1976).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  10. Haber, R. N. in The Adaptive Function of Imagery (ed. Segal, S. J.) 38–48 (Academic, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar

  11. Efron, R. Perception Psychophys. 8, 231–234 (1970).

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Allport, D. A. Br. J. PsychoL 59, 395–406 (1968).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  13. Bowen, R. W., Pola, J. & Matin, L. Vision Res. 14, 295–303 (1974).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  14. Meyer, G. E., Lawson, R. & Cohen, W. Vision Res. 15, 569–572 (1975).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    VINCENT DI LOLLO

Authors

  1. VINCENT DI LOLLO

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DI LOLLO, V. Temporal characteristics of iconic memory. Nature 267, 241–243 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/267241a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/267241a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Temporal characteristics of iconic memory (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Fredrick Kertzmann

Last Updated:

Views: 6194

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Fredrick Kertzmann

Birthday: 2000-04-29

Address: Apt. 203 613 Huels Gateway, Ralphtown, LA 40204

Phone: +2135150832870

Job: Regional Design Producer

Hobby: Nordic skating, Lacemaking, Mountain biking, Rowing, Gardening, Water sports, role-playing games

Introduction: My name is Fredrick Kertzmann, I am a gleaming, encouraging, inexpensive, thankful, tender, quaint, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.